| Bar Bulletin |
December, 2004 |
Administrative Law Judges Convene
in Baltimore
By Janet Stidman Eveleth
On November 3, 130+ administrative law judges gathered in Baltimore for
the National Association of Administrative Law Judges’ (NAALJ) 30th annual
national conference at the Radisson Plaza Lord Baltimore Hotel. Over the
course of the five-day event, the audience of administrative law judges,
attorneys and other officials delved into contemporary administrative law
issues and trends. The Maryland State Bar Association (MSBA) was a
co-sponsor of the NAALJ Conference.
University of Baltimore School of Law Dean Gilbert A. Holmes, whose law
school houses NAALJ’s headquarters, opened the conference, then Jervis S.
Finney, Legal Counsel to the Governor, offered greetings on behalf of
Maryland Governor Robert Ehrlich. Finney cited the important role
administrative law judges play in Maryland and across the nation.
This sentiment was echoed by Maryland Comptroller William Donald Schaefer,
who traced the creation and development of Maryland’s centralized Office
of Administrative Hearings and recognized NAALJ Executive Director John
Hardwicke, former OAH chief judge, for his efforts in establishing the
agency. “OAH is dedicated to treating people fairly in the due process of
law,” stated Hardwicke.
A number of timely topics were addressed, including ethics, diversity, the
pros and cons of central panels, professionalism, pro se representation,
mediation and judicial writing. A number of Maryland attorneys and judges
were speakers and attendees. Administrative Judge Joan Gordon, a former
MSBA Ethics Committee Chair, addressed ethical issues and violations of
the code. The administrative judges also attempted to define
professionalism. They consider professionalism “the highest standard
expected of all lawyers,” and ethics “the minimum standard expected for
all lawyers.”
A panel of Maryland state agency chiefs debated the pros and cons of
Maryland’s current OAH structure. “Central panels hold the government
accountable,” stated Kenneth D. Schisler, Chair of Maryland’s Public
Service Commission. “This leads to better regulations, which better serves
the public. Administrative law judges address voids in the law.” James D.
Fielder, the head of Maryland’s Department of Labor, Licensing and
Regulation, added, “OAH is an independent arbiter that removes politics.”
Although the majority supported a centralized system, there was one
dissenter, the Board of Physician Quality Assurance. Tom Keech, Board
Counsel, wants doctors exempted. He advocates the removal of medical
malpractice cases from Maryland’s OAH because “administrative law judges
don’t know medicine or understand medical standards. They lack the medical
background to judge quality, so they judge quantity.” Keech feels the
Board’s panel of physicians should handle hearings for doctors, as opposed
to OAH.
Maryland attorneys offered their own views on the overall OAH process. “In
trial, you present your evidence with the jury in mind,” explains Kenneth
Armstrong. “At an OAH hearing, you persuade by establishing a record. The
emotional issues are removed. It is hard for lawyers to make this
transition, and it is not something you learn in law school or a CLE
course.”
Overall response to the conference was positive. “It has been very
successful,” stated NAALJ President Chris Graham. “We’ve had outstanding
CLE programs and a good turnout.”