TAX TALK
Published by the Section of Taxation of the Maryland
State Bar Association, Inc.
· Jonathan Z. May, Chair ·
Stephanie Ketchum, Editor,
Catherine Mary Rafferty, Asst. Editor
|
Volume XI Number 1
|
Fall 2002
|
Recent Maryland Tax Court Cases
By Jack Hearn
Income
Oracle Corp. v. Comptroller
– On a procedural issue, the Tax Court denied Motions to Dismiss appeals
of duplicate assessments that had been erroneously issued by the
Comptroller subsequent to the time that the original assessments had
become final. The Court found that due to the fact that errors by both
parties were made, and since there was no prejudice to the Comptroller,
justice demanded that the taxpayer be given its due process hearing
rights.
Real Property
W.F.I. Stadium, Inc. v. Prince George’s County
– Redskins Stadium was deemed substantially complete by SDAT and
assessed in 1997 but was not issued the final use and occupancy permit
until 1999. The County used the initial assessment as the application
starting point in denying as untimely the stadium’s claim for the county
revitalization credit. The statute allows for application the first year
after an improvement is "completed and assessed." The Tax Court
determined that since a final use and occupancy permit is required by
statute to accompany the tax credit application, despite the fact that the
stadium was used for football for two seasons, the stadium was not
complete until such permit was issued. Thus, the taxpayer was entitled to
apply for the credit based on the higher assessed value.
Franchise
General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. SDAT
–
The Tax Court found that the State’s inclusion of foreign dividends in
Maryland taxable income for franchise tax purposes, while domestic
dividends were not included, amounts to facial unconstitutional
discrimination in violation of the Foreign Commerce Clause.
Personal Property
Maryland Association of Nonprofit Organizations v. SDAT
– The Tax Court ruled that the taxpayer organization was not
primarily charitable, but was primarily educational in nature and thus
entitled to the exemption from personal property tax. However, the Court
only ordered a partial exemption that would apply to that property
actually contributing to the organization’s educational function and
remanded the appeal to the SDAT to determine the appropriate amount.
Consolidation Coal Sales Company v. SDAT –
The Tax Court decided that personal property used to receive, store, blend
and ship coal to customers does not substantially transform - and is not a
step in the process of substantially transforming - the coal to warrant
the reclassification of the property to exempt manufacturing equipment.
While the blending process is sophisticated, the Court noted that there is
no transformation of the individual coal nuggets before they are shipped.
Recordation
Host Marriott Corporation v. Montgomery County
– The Tax Court found that a transfer of real property from a
corporation to a LLC for nominal consideration for internal restructuring
purposes was not exempt from recordation tax pursuant to TP §12-108(p),
which only exempts transactions between related corporations. In addition,
the exemption under TP §21-108(y) did not apply, as corporations are not
included as a "predecessor entity" from which a transfer to a
LLC would be exempt.
Transfer
Baltimore County Employees Credit Union v. Clerk of
Circuit Court – The Tax Court found that the federal exemption
from the payment of transfer tax afforded a credit union as seller of real
property can not be extended to the buyer by contract or otherwise as the
legal incidence of the transfer tax falls half on the buyer and half on
the seller. The Court also ruled that the credit union is not an
instrumentality of the United States for purposes of acquiring and selling
real property as it does not perform a government function.
|